# BentoPDF vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; 心潮动态心智系统 needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind