# BentoPDF vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 16 181 ✓ | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-woodpecker-ci