# BentoPDF vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+481 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-uusec-waf