# BentoPDF vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +473 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-url-to-png