# BentoPDF vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-sdnext