# BentoPDF vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 16 181 | 35 504 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | +1 772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-rustfs