# BentoPDF vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 ✓ | 2 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-rsyslog