# BentoPDF vs qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 1 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-qbittorrent-linuxserverio