# BentoPDF vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 | 25 829 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +30 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-pulumi