# BentoPDF vs pi-dispatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | pi-dispatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #50 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.1 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 50/100 for pi-dispatch, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pi-dispatch.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; pi-dispatch needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [pi-dispatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-dispatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-dispatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-pi-dispatch