# BentoPDF vs PhotoMigrator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | PhotoMigrator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-photomigrator