# BentoPDF vs openvox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | openvox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 ✓ | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 8.31.2 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.

openvox ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [openvox](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-openvox