# BentoPDF vs open·kritt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | open·kritt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 ✓ | 2 384 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-open-kritt