# BentoPDF vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 ✓ | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 ✓ | +258 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-octobot