# BentoPDF vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 | 17 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 ✓ | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+481 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-nomad