# BentoPDF vs NATS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 20 957 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +192 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; NATS needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-nats