# BentoPDF vs muxarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | muxarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #85 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 ✓ | 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.9.13 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 47/100 for muxarr, so it is the safer default.

muxarr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; muxarr needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [muxarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/muxarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/muxarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-muxarr