# BentoPDF vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 16 175 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +476 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+476 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-mqttx-web