# BentoPDF vs MeshCentral

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | MeshCentral |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 ✓ | 7 533 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 ✓ | +255 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 74/100 for MeshCentral, so it is the safer default.

MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [MeshCentral](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-meshcentral