# BentoPDF vs Mayan EDMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | Mayan EDMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #18 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 174 ✓ | 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +475 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0-only |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 58/100 for Mayan EDMS, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Mayan EDMS.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Mayan EDMS needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+475 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [Mayan EDMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mayan-edms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mayan-edms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-mayan-edms