# BentoPDF vs matrix-media-repo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BentoPDF | matrix-media-repo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #53 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 ✓ | 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 52/100 for matrix-media-repo, so it is the safer default.

BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for matrix-media-repo.

If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; matrix-media-repo needs more configuration.

BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+481 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BentoPDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bentopdf.md)
- [matrix-media-repo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-media-repo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-media-repo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bentopdf-vs-matrix-media-repo