BenchervsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bencher | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Performance monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 923 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.6.14 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 54/100 for Bencher, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Bencher.
If you want the quickest setup, Bencher is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
Bencher details →ReadMeABook details →