# Belenios vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Belenios | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #49 of 78 in Security | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 156 | 46 459 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | OCaml | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 48/100 for Belenios, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Belenios.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Belenios needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Belenios](https://selfhost.directory/project/belenios) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/belenios.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/belenios-vs-mitmproxy