# beam vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | beam | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +2 430 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 61/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.

beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [beam](https://selfhost.directory/project/beam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/beam.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/beam-vs-world-monitor