# beam vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | beam | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 92 515 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +57 574 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 ✓ | 35 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 61/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.

beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 574 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [beam](https://selfhost.directory/project/beam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/beam.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/beam-vs-omnivoice-studio