BackstagevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 34 734 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →