BackstagevsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 34 734 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage details →WhisperLive---CPU details →