# Backstage vs WebCodex

> Two self-hosted [Developer Tools projects](https://selfhost.directory/developer-tools), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | WebCodex |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 34 734 ✓ | 2 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 78/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.

If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.

Backstage is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [WebCodex](https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-webcodex