BackstagevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →UUSEC WAF details →