# Backstage vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 34 740 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.

Backstage is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api