# Backstage vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 34 734 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 78/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

If you want the quickest setup, UglyFeed is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.

Backstage is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-uglyfeed