Backstagevstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 34 742 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 79/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →textsnap details →