# Backstage vs openDCIM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | openDCIM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 34 738 ✓ | 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0-only |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 79/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.

Backstage is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [openDCIM](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-opendcim