# Backstage vs gluetun

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | gluetun |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #5 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 ✓ | 15 909 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 78/100 against 75/100 for gluetun, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for gluetun.

If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-gluetun