Backstagevsgluetun
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | gluetun | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #5 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 | 15 909 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 75/100 for gluetun, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for gluetun.
If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
gluetun is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →gluetun details →