# Backstage vs filestash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Backstage | filestash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 ✓ | 14 835 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +124 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Backstage scores 78/100 against 70/100 for filestash, so it is the safer default.

Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Backstage](https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/backstage.md)
- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/backstage-vs-filestash