# Baby Buddy vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Baby Buddy | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Baby Buddy, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Baby Buddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Baby Buddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/baby-buddy-vs-zigbee2mqtt