# Baby Buddy vs youtube-dl-nas

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Baby Buddy | youtube-dl-nas |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 ✓ | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Baby Buddy scores 66/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.

youtube-dl-nas ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Baby Buddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.

Baby Buddy is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Baby Buddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy.md)
- [youtube-dl-nas](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/baby-buddy-vs-youtube-dl-nas