Baby Buddyvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Baby Buddy | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Baby Buddy scores 66/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Baby Buddy ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Baby Buddy is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Baby Buddy details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Baby Buddy, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with