# Baby Buddy vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Baby Buddy | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 932 | 4 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +45 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Baby Buddy scores 66/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

Baby Buddy ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Baby Buddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/baby-buddy-vs-whisperlive-cpu