# Baby Buddy vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Baby Buddy | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 | 11 046 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +47 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

unopim scores 69/100 against 66/100 for Baby Buddy, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Baby Buddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; unopim needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Baby Buddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/baby-buddy.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/baby-buddy-vs-unopim