Baby Buddyvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Baby Buddy | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Baby Buddy scores 66/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Baby Buddy ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
Baby Buddy is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Baby Buddy details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep Baby Buddy, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with