Baby Buddyvssocial_recipes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Baby Buddy | social_recipes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #16 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 932 | 52 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v1.9.10 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Baby Buddy scores 66/100 against 43/100 for social_recipes, so it is the safer default.
social_recipes ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Baby Buddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; social_recipes needs more configuration.
Baby Buddy is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).
Baby Buddy details →social_recipes details →
Swap a project
Keep Baby Buddy, compare it with
Keep social_recipes, compare it with