AzuraCastvsMusicBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AzuraCast | MusicBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #2 of 31 in Music |
| GitHub stars | 4 076 | 5 774 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
MusicBot scores 67/100 against 66/100 for AzuraCast, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, MusicBot is easier to run; AzuraCast needs more configuration.
AzuraCast is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
AzuraCast details →MusicBot details →
Swap a project
Keep AzuraCast, compare it with
Keep MusicBot, compare it with