# avideo vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +26 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero-K scores 62/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-zero-k