# avideo vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-windows-arm