avideovsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 10 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with