# avideo vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +6 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-uusec-waf