avideovstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
transfer.sh is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with