avideovsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with